Julia Haart Ex Silvio Scaglia Jail Warrant Explained: Contempt Order and What’s Next

Julia Haart’s ex-husband is facing jail time after their divorce settlement. Short answer: Page Six reports (Sept. 25, 2026) that New York Judge Jeffrey Pearlman issued a no-bail bench warrant for Italian businessman Silvio Scaglia, ordering 14 days in jail for civil and criminal contempt tied to alleged asset moves and ignored court orders during the couple’s long divorce fight over Elite World Group.

  • Page Six (Sept. 25): court papers dated Sept. 22; no-bail warrant; 14-day jail order; civil + criminal contempt findings.
  • Allegations in papers: transferring Elite / marital assets after divorce began; “siphoning” funds into cars and jewelry; failing to appear when ordered.
  • Divorce outcome previously reported: Haart awarded 100% of Elite World Group and the couple’s ~$57M Tribeca apartment after a multi-year ~$90M split.
  • Scaglia reportedly living in Italy and has not submitted to U.S. authorities; his side previously denied allegations; no comment to Page Six on the warrant story.
  • Bamfuzzle angle: reality-TV / celebrity-divorce legal explainer (My Unorthodox Life). No prior Bamfuzzle URL or Notion draft.

What did the judge order?

Page Six, citing court papers, says Judge Jeffrey Pearlman found Scaglia in civil and criminal contempt for knowingly violating court orders and issued a no-bail bench warrant demanding he be jailed for 14 days. A bench warrant here means an arrest order after alleged failure to appear / comply, not a new jury verdict on the original divorce property fight.

Julia Haart Ex Silvio Scaglia Jail Warrant Explained Contempt Order and Whats Next

What is Scaglia accused of doing?

According to the Page Six summary of the papers:

  • Moving shared assets after the divorce formally began (not allowed under the spouse-asset rules the court applied)
  • Transferring the modeling firm without Haart’s permission
  • Using company funds for luxury cars and jewelry (Bentleys, Porsches, Van Cleef & Arpels pieces cited in prior findings)
  • Ignoring court orders, including earlier payment directives

Scaglia’s attorneys have previously denied the allegations, Page Six notes. He did not respond to the outlet’s requests for comment on the warrant.

What is Scaglia accused of doing

How does this connect to Julia Haart and Elite?

Haart, star of Netflix’s My Unorthodox Life, was appointed CEO of Elite after Scaglia bought the agency in 2011; they married in 2019 and split in 2022. Page Six says the four-year divorce recently ended with Haart walking away with Elite and the Tribeca apartment after the court concluded Scaglia had already moved more than his share of value to himself.

Where is Scaglia now

Where is Scaglia now?

Page Six reports he appears to be in Italy and has not turned himself in to U.S. authorities on the warrant. Until he is in custody or the warrant is vacated, the 14-day jail order is an outstanding enforcement step, not a completed sentence.

FAQ

Is Silvio Scaglia in jail already?

Not according to Page Six’s Sept. 25 report. A no-bail warrant was issued; he had not submitted to U.S. authorities.

What is a no-bail bench warrant?

A judge’s order to arrest someone, here tied to contempt / failure to comply, without setting bail in that order as described by Page Six.

Did Julia Haart win Elite?

Page Six reports she was awarded 100% of Elite World Group and the Tribeca apartment in the divorce resolution.

Is this part of My Unorthodox Life?

Haart’s Netflix fame is the Discover hook; the warrant itself is a New York court action reported by Page Six, not a show plot point.

Sources

  1. Page Six, Sept. 25, 2026: Sept. 22 court papers; warrant and 14-day jail order; contempt findings; Elite / Tribeca outcome; Italy whereabouts; prior denials / no comment.

Henry Callahan
Henry Callahan

Henry Callahan writes about celebrity feuds, TV reboots, and true crime cold cases for Bamfuzzle. He's the one who builds the dated timeline before forming an opinion, and he will absolutely tell you when something was "denied" versus actually confirmed.